The https://english.atlatszo.hu use cookies to track and profile customers such as action tags and pixel tracking on our website to assist our marketing. On our website we use technical, analytical, marketing and preference cookies. These are necessary for our site to work properly and to give us inforamation about how our site is used. See Cookies Policy
Press freedom and illiberalism – case study on Átlátszó and Átlátszó Transylvania
2
Democracies and the Rule of Law are under attack worldwide, including in Europe. This is accompanied by a trend of shrinking civic space, which threatens independent media, and with that a pluralistic media landscape. How do we fight this? Free Press Unlimited published a study that examined the strategies through which independent media outlets in Europe resist and push back against shrinking civic space. The case study analyses include KRIK (Serbia), Oštro (Slovenia) and Liber in Teleorman (Romania), as well as Átlátszó (Hungary) and Átlátszó Transylvania (Romania).
Five examples of push back in Europe
In the study (PDF), the challenges and strategies of independent media outlets who are experiencing the shrinking civic space in Europe are explored. It presents five case studies on specific media outlets in the countries Slovenia, Serbia, Romania, and Hungary. These describe the overall political context for the media, the specific challenges that the respective media outlet has faced, as well as the different strategies that they have used to meet these challenges.
(null)
(null)
Lessons learned
The study sheds light on the strategies these media used to push back, and what the advantages and disadvantages of these strategies were. Senior Knowledge Officer and research editor Tim Schoot Uiterkamp drew some important lessons for independent media out of this analysis: “Generally it is important for independent media to incorporate local content, also for national media to reach other demographics. Then they should defend credibility, know how not to take bait and always be very strict in verifying everything you publish. One mistake can be used to frame you.”
He continues: “Lastly it is important to engage audiences. When media embed themselves in a particular community, it can be helpful to gain access to information, but also to ensure impact.”
The study further describes the main strategies that media outlets can use to reach these objectives, for example certain verification processes and cross-border collaboration.
Webinar: Defending Media Pluralism
The study led to a webinar on 12 May hosted by Free Press Unlimited, called: Defending Media Pluralism. Two of the discussed media outlets (Atlatszo and Ostro) were there to tell their story, and Tim Schoot Uiterkamp introduced the study to several members of EU Commission and Parliament. The participants in the webinar discussed the strategies to defend media pluralism in European countries where the Rule of Law is under attack, and civic space is shrinking. How can policy makers support the viability of independent media in this context?